- NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 4 Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care.
Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care
Through virtual collaboration and clinical data-driven approaches, a new standard of care has been set in contemporary healthcare delivery, where patients’ well-being and the quality of care are improved significantly. Taking advantage of remote communication resources such as telemedicine, virtual counseling, remote monitoring, and digital health platforms that set aside the geographical distance and help healthcare professionals collaborate efficiently across distances (Keesara et al., 2020).
For clinicians, the collaborative approach also extends to interdisciplinary teams, thus the care becomes comprehensive and holistic (Halpern et al., 2020). The evidence-based approach depends on concrete guidelines, systematic reviews, and electronic records to make clinical decisions based on the most conclusive evidence. Through clinical decision-making systems, this process is even further enhanced by providing real-time suggestions for medical care (Osheroff et al., 2020).
Through constant learning and training, healthcare practitioners keep themselves up to date with the latest evidence in clinical practice, giving them an edge in providing the best, most personalized care to each patient.
Evidence-Based Care Plan to Improve the Safety and Outcomes
Based on the case study, utilizing the multidisciplinary remote collaboration approach aimed at alleviating CHF in rural areas necessitates the development of an evidence-based care plan for a 65-year-old male patient diagnosed with CHF. The case provider is Dr. Johnson, who virtually consults with a team of a cardiologist, a nurse, and a pharmacist to offer comprehensive health care to the patient.
The cardiologist suggests managing the symptoms using ACE inhibitors and diuretics. At the same time, a nurse recommends implementing a telemonitoring system, which will allow for control of the patient’s vital signs and detect cases of symptom exacerbations. The pharmacist highlights the importance of medication adherence education and counseling for the patient and the family member. Mr. Johnson acknowledges that the team has given all their valuable input in the patient care plan and will schedule the virtual visit to monitor the progress and adjust the patient care plan as needed (American Heart Association, 2020).
Along with the patient’s medical status and function assessment, the family, health literacy, financial resources, and health care utilization patterns should inform the plan by focusing on those items, the healthcare professional witnesses the delivery of care with optimal patient safety and patient outcomes while using the capabilities of telemedicine in rural areas.
Ways to Use a Specific Evidence-Based Practice Model
In designing the care plan for the patient with congestive heart failure (CHF) in the given case study, the Stetler Model of Evidence-Based Practice was beneficial, allowing us to keep track of every critical aspect. It was a multi-step affair, so to speak. First, the team had to familiarize themselves with the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and diagnostic results to understand what the patient might need clearly.
Hence, shortly after, the mistake of the doctor’s diagnosis of CHF and the treatment recommendations were also mentioned, which were part of the validation. The researchers followed the next phase, where they compared the different evidence-based interventions, which included traditional in-person monitoring with the best-suited approach for the patient’s rural community, which was telehealth intervention (Smith, J., 2020). Next, the utilization stage targeted the multidisciplinary team as it formulated an integrated care plan centered on medication management, home monitoring through telecommunications, medication adherence education, and lifestyle modifications that were gauged from the validated evidence and comparison review.
NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 4 Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care
Secondly, follow-up visits were conducted irregularly to check on the patient’s progress and the efficacy of the implemented interventions. The team that implemented Stetler’s carefully developed model was able to establish a care plan that was self-evident, corresponding to the patient’s problems, and oritowardtowardted on improving patient outcomes for the patient with CHF.
Most Relevant Evidence
The most relevant and helpful care plan for the patient with congestive heart failure (CHF) in the case study has been formulated based on an amalgamation of evidence from different sources. First, the patient’s clinical presentation, such as shortness of breath, fatigue, and leg swelling, and his prime medical history of hypertension, helped the medical team understand in depth the degree and nature of his CHF.
These variables acted as landmark medical points when deciding what treatments could be most helpful in controlling symptoms and improving heart function. In addition to the echocardiogram findings, the diagnostic results were paramount in setting the CHF diagnosis, providing clinical data on the patient’s heart condition, and guiding management options.
Furthermore, the team with a multidisciplinary background, including the cardiologist, nurse, and pharmacist, additionally offered essential guidance on health plans. Their knowledge and practical advice about medication, telemonitoring, medication adherence education, and lifestyle changes made our care plan as complete as possible because their experience and research were used as the basis (Smith, J. D. 2020). The foundational framework for evidence-based guidelines and the literature on CHF management were also significant factors. This provided a direction to the interventions and gave information about the current practice and recommendations.
NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 4 Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care
Ultimately, the collected data’s value depends on its clinical usefulness, adequacy, and alignment with current best practice dos and don’ts guidelines. These factors combine to form a focused care course for the patient, addressing their specific circumstances and designed to reach optimal results.
Benefits and Proposed Strategies
An interdisciplinary collaboration of a remote team is a desirable option with multiple benefits of care planning, particularly suiting the cases witnessed in the congestive heart failure patient scenario. It permits the care of patients in a way that brings to bear the expertise of all manner of healthcare professionals so that treatment plans that are customized for each person can be formulated.
Remote cooperation also allows for quick connection to highly specialized care, thus overcoming the barriers of distance to cater to patients most favorably in underserved rural areas. This tool facilitates accurate and timely information sharing with team members, ensuring prompt interventions and improving patient care outcomes.
NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 4 Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care
Conversely, remote co-working poses challenges like communication obstacles, technical issues, and fear of data leaks. To tackle these problem,s efficient communication tools, training programs, research processes, and extensive data security systems should be implemented (Smith, J. D. 2020)Into the future, interdisciplinary collaboration in care situations should be further aimed at continuity of care, shared decision-making, telehealth-supported solutions, anevidence-based quality improvemented. Through the integratiBy integratingnd overcoming barriers to interdisciplinary work in distant teams, healthcare institutions can achieve the best care and increase results for their patpatient resultsusion, the presented evidence-based care plan concerning our 35-year-old female patient with anxiety is to improve her health status regarding medication manaprovideprovided cognitive-behavioral theraemployyment of effective interventions related to the client’s social networks.
Applying the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model meant that the care plan had to be developed systematically and using the most appropriate and evidence-based interventions within the literature. Telecommuhealthcare professionals, such as nurses, psychiatrists, therapists, and social workers, were very significant in developing this care.
But the advanta,ges like accessibility, the w ay of work, , and of cou,rse the cost asp,ect speak for remote cNevertheless, Neverobstaclesrome obstac,les which aremention,nt to mentiose are technical problems, language barriers, and security issues to provida practicalve approach in the case of remote care .Medical facilities’ anphysicians ‘ responsee to these challenges, along with continued adherence to a patient-centered approach, will allow for the delivery of quality, safe, and effective care to patients, including those who live in remote regions. Everyone is well-educated by now, and any question directed to me will be answered.
References
Desai, A. S., Maclean, T., Blood, A. J., Bosque-Hamilton, J., Dunning, J., Fischer, C., Fera, L., Smith, K. V., Wagholikar, K., Zelle, D., Gaziano, T., Plutzky, J., Scirica, B., & MacRae, C. A. (2020). Remote optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JAMA Cardiology, 5(12), 1430.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3757
Neubeck, L., Hansea, T., Klompstra, L., & Gallagher, R. (2020). Delivering healthcare remotely to cardiovascular patients during COVID-19. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(6), 147451512092453.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515120924530
Saunders, H., Gallagher, Healthcare, Kvist, T., & Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, K. (2019). Practicing healthcare professionals’ evidence‐based practice competencies: An overview of systematic reviews. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(3), 176–185.
https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12363
Shayan, S. J., Kiwanuka, F., & Nakaye, Z. (2019). Barriers associated with evidence‐based practice among nurses in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(1), 12–20.
https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12337
Smith, K., Ostinelli, E., Macdonald, O., & Cipriani, A. (2020). COVID-19 and telepsychiatry: Development of evidence-based guidance for clinicians. JMIR Mental Health, 7(8).
Speroni, K. G., McLaughlin, M. K., & Friesen, M. A. (2020). Use of evidence‐based practice models and research findings in magnet‐designated hospitals across the United States: National survey results. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(2), 98–107.
https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12428
van Os, J., Guloksuz, S., Vijn, T. W., Hafkenscheid, A., & Delespaul, P. (2019). The evidence-based group-level symptom-reduction model as the organizing principle for mental health care: Time for change? World Psychiatry, 18(1), 88–96.