NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 01:
Locating Credible Databases and Research

Locating Credible Databases and Research

Looking for guidance with your NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 01? Our experts are here to assist you. Reach out to us for support today.

As an EBP-trained newbie nurse working on the pneumonia treatment plan, I personally should learn this method by heart so that no stone remains unturned when giving the best treatment to each of the patients. Acute respiratory infections like pneumonia arise as a result of the inflammation of the alveoli and the accumulation of excess fluids in the lungs of patients and this therefore demands that these strategies be well evidence based to ensure effectiveness. The aim of this text is to provide some basics on what EBP procedure in the treatment for patients with pneumonia can look like (Mayo Clinic, 2022). In present time, wheelchair users are going to be able to get immediate access the behavior-based factsheets, current researches, and up-to-date evidence-based treatments. These applications help to nurses' care giving skills effective on pneumonia patients.

Communication Strategies

Communication strategies will be key as to how we educate nurses so as to participate in the research of diseases like pneumonia. Nurses can be successful in this by underscoring the role of EBP as well as the need for the incorporation of current research into clinical judgment (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Taking into account real life clinical situations improves nurses' understanding that how research can make a huge difference in their patient care provision (Mazurek et al., 2020). Additionally to providing incentives for research participation, it is possible to increase interest and active engagement of nurses in finding evidence-based solutions for clinical problems, thus can develop culture of continuous professional improving. In addition, nurses may acquire more knowledge and skills, and as a result, they build their professional competence. At the same time, this demonstrates organizational support for professional growth and development with which nurses develop a positive professional relationship.

Best Places to Complete Research

Within the workplace, depending on nature of work, it is possible to find such corners where nurses can do constructive research. From the main library or resource center, one can find computers, textbooks, and electronic databases accessible. At this point, healthcare providers may rest easy knowing that they can conduct extensive literature searches and get reliable guidance and advice throughout the entire process from competent staff and librarians. (Schulte, 2019). Moreover, staff lounges or breakfasts, often equipped with a computer or the Internet facilities, give nurses the opportunity for online research when they have some free time to afford them with pleasant places of research. Collaboration and sharing lovely things with coworkers may be assisted. Educational institutions centered or equipped with multimedia resources where nurses can access educational materials or attended training sessions relevant to diagnosing certain diseases is a great step to literacy among the nurses (Melnyk et al., 2020). These places prove to be indispensible for nurses because they allow them to receive the required information rapidly, use the up-to-date data when determining diagnosis and treatments of the patients, and even interact with their colleagues, in fact it helps in both - promotion of the best care for patients and their personal development as well.

Five Sources of Online Information

PubMed:

 The PubMed is the most common and inclusive database of the biomedical literature available at any platform. You can reach peer-reviewed articles, case studies or systemic reviews in this online repository (National Library of Medicine, 2022). A nurse uses PubMed to come up with a study that is related to the particular diagnosis/healthcare challenge that she has, such as the careful management of pneumonia, the various effective treatments, and their outcomes.

Cochrane Library:

The Cochrane Library is aimed at systematic reviews and evidence synthesis; the documents in this collection have a particular significance for informing decisions in the clinical setting (Higgins & Green, 2019). Nurses have a good possibility to find out current systematic reviews and meta-analysis on relevant treatments for the diagnosis/health problem thus obtaining to research into efficient treatment techniques.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE):

The core task of NICE is devising and disseminating evidence-based guidelines and recommendations, which pertain to a great variety of healthcare issues and clinical interventions. (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2020) Nursing staff may look up directly at the NICE guidelines pertaining specifically to the diagnosis/healthcare issue which will present practical recommendations for patient care, applicable under a given set of circumstances.

American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals:

Through ATS, we have a range of respiratory journals which include pneumonia etiology and treatment (American Thoracic Society, 2022). Already experienced nurses can look into the ATS journals, which will provide them some recent articles and clinical guidelines that are specifically tailored to practice pneumonia and evidence-based decisions.

UpToDate:

UpToDate, clinical decision support tool, aimed to provide evidence-based information on different conditions and treatments (UpToDate, 2022). UpToDate may not be as comprehensive as PubMed or Cochrane Library, providing brief brief summary and guideline for the diagnosis/health care issue but, still helps in providing optimization of knowledge for nurses in clinical practice.

Sources Selected Should Provide the Best Evidence

When analyzing these sources the author aims to collect the best information about pneumonia diagnosis which will be obtained by analyzing their relevance and applicability. The literature references Pubmed and Cochrane library are distinguished by their seriousness in biomedical research; they cover the peer-reviewed articles to clinical trials and systematic reviews which give a wide range of evidence used in the treatment of pneumonia (National Library of Medicine, 2022; Higgins & Green, 2019). Moreover, the norm of producers promoting only the best quality evidence gives nurses the ability to access accurate and dependable information that they can utilize when making their clinical decisions and this is critical for evidence-based practice. The Cochrane Library, with its clear focus on systematic reviews, provides a structure for summarizing and systematically evaluating evidence based medicine which is of significance for nursing staff since these people need to approach difficult decisions like the utilization of different diagnostic tests or treatment modalities for pneumonia (Higgins & Green, 2019). The sources available such as National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals are relied upon for their evidence-based directions and instructions pertaining to the diagnosis of pneumonia. These are included in diagnostic algorithms, imaging guidelines, and criteria for severe pneumonia assessment. (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2020; Author of American Coming next, digital accessibility and usability solution of UpToDate enables the nurses to have quick look to succinct summaries and recommendations that help them integrate the evidence into clinical care modernizing, for instance, indication of main clinical features of pneumonia and interpretation of diagnostic findings (UpToDate, 2022). Communally this kind of literature completes an evidence-based base of pneumonia diagnosis which nurses utilize for taking decisions confidently that helps patients’ well-being.

Conclusion

In conclusion, to promulgate EBP, outlining the process of spotting reliable databases and sources plays a very important role for nurses, as it is especially significant in diagnosing and managing such conditions as pneumonia. Nurses are able to access trusted sources like PubMed Cochrane Library, ATS Journals which literature reviews, and guidelines to make evidence based choices. Additionally, resources like National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) give evidence-bases specialize guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia the nurses follow to improve the quality of care they offer. Similarly, working with the team members, accessing resources within the workplace environment, and developing and applying some communication strategies are the key elements that ensure the professional growth and active role of health care team members in research. Eventually, credible databases and research sources can be used by nurses in clinical practice to help better patient outcomes and help develop medicine and healthcare as a whole.

References

Ahmed, M. S., Rahman, A., AlGhamdi, F., AlDakheel, S., Hakami, H., AlJumah, A., AlIbrahim, Z., Youldash, M., Alam Khan, M. A., & Basheer Ahmed, M. I. (2023). Joint diagnosis of pneumonia, COVID-19, and tuberculosis from chest x-ray images: A deep learning approach. Diagnostics, 13(15), 2562. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152562

Ahmed, M., Abbas, I., & Yasser AbdelSatar. (2023). HDSNE a new unsupervised multiple image database fusion learning algorithm with flexible and crispy production of one database: A proof case study of lung infection diagnose in chest x-ray images. BMC Medical Imaging, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-023-01078-3

Brima, Y., Atemkeng, M., Tankio Djiokap, S., Ebiele, J., & Tchakounté, F. (2021). Transfer learning for the detection and diagnosis of types of pneumonia including pneumonia induced by COVID-19 from chest x-ray images. Diagnostics, 11(8), 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081480

Kundu, R., Das, R., Geem, Z. W., Han, G.-T., & Sarkar, R. (2021). Pneumonia detection in chest x-ray images using an ensemble of deep learning models. PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0256630. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256630

Souza, J., Pimenta, D., Caballero, I., & Freitas, A. (2020). Measuring data credibility and medical coding: A case study using a nationwide portuguese inpatient database. Software Quality Journal, 28(3), 1043–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-020-09504-3

Wang, S.-H., Muhammad Attique Khan, Zhu, Z., & Zhang, Y.-D. (2023). WACPN: A neural network for pneumonia diagnosis. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 45(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2023.031330

Require help with your Assessments? Our expert team is standing by to assist you. Get in touch with us now