NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2 Change Strategy and Implementation
Looking for guidance with your NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2? Our experts are here to assist you. Reach out to us for support today.
The purpose of the medical field is to do research into the practices that are best in order to make sure that the patient under treatment is satisfied with the health outcome. Nurses are crucial participating, they use sources such as guidelines for clinicians, practice guidelines, and professional organization protocols to identify problems that need to be solved (Smith et al, 2020). Considering that the toughest part is not only the recognition of the areas but also the development of a strategic plan for the change. Without proper implementation, enhancing patient care quality would be nothing more than a dream. The practical evaluation of this skill is concerned with multiple critical thinking skills, such as the identification, analysis, and implementation of strategies that enhance patient outcomes during clinical practice. It is based on this paradigm explains the system, has a change strategy that is committed to real-time data-driven insights.
| Time Period | Current Rate of Secondary Infections (%) | Desired Rate of Secondary Infections (%) |
| Q1 2024 | 12 | 8 |
| Q2 2024 | 11 | 7 |
| Q3 2024 | 10 | 6 |
| Q4 2024 | 9 | 5 |
Data Table
-
Areas of Ambiguity or Uncertainty:
Data Collection Methodology:
It is also vital to define the way you shall be able to collect secondary rates of infection. So, it was a clinically diagnosed case, or a laboratory-based test result, or a surveillance illustration qualified for the same? Providing additional explanations as to how that data is gathered may help make sure that the presented rates as accurate and reliable as possible.
Infection Classification:
Are all secondary infection especially those considered as technicalities and as exclusion from reporting rates, or are certain types of infections only reported? Defining the guidelines to explain the criteria of categorization of secondary infections with consistency of reporting in different time frame and healthcare units will be helpful for sure.
Patient Population:
Is the data based on a particular patient population, possibly a unit or wards that a patient currently resides? Tying the demographics and clinical characteristics of the patient community to the understanding of infection rates is an invaluable good practice with which to interpret the infection rates.
Temporal Trends:
Is there the existence of any seasonal or temporal trend in secondary infection rates that require special interpretation? A comparison of the data, not only spanning over the given period, but also the long term trends will help you spot any patterns or exceptions which might be of interest.
Data Validation:
What was the process of the data accuracy and its validity control? Quality assurance being a recurring process like data audits or validation check helps in reflecting on data errors or any other issue in the reported rates.
Need assistance with your NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2? Count on our experts to provide guidance. Contact us now for prompt help.
Proposed Change Strategy for the Outcomes
-
Enhanced Staff Training and Education:
Establish complete training experience for each healthcare staff member ensuring infection control approach is understood, hand hygiene rules, and PPE use is correctly followed (Jones et al., 2021). The concept of the program design includes the observance of sufficient involvement and active participation in training sessions simultaneously among busy healthcare professionals. Implementing a mix of different training schemes with interactive methods can ensure a high level of staff engagement. Furthermore, you could offer incentives or give acknowledgment to the staff for their participation.
-
Improved Surveillance and Monitoring Systems:
Equip health authorities with strong surveillance systems that can track and monitor real-time infection rates. This will allow quick identification of any viral outbreaks and trends (Smith & Brown, 2020). However, it will be front loaded given the various logistics the new systems this will require in addition to the training. Work closely with IT departments to draft a selection plan and roll all processes out to the stakeholders. Continue to provide breakthroughs of surveillance systems’ utilization and other resources for the same.
-
Standardized Infection Prevention Protocols:
Create and implement standard form for the infection prevention and control program, which will involve isolation of patients, environmental cleansing, and sterilization practices (Johnson et al., 2019). Change resistance, or non-compliance with new regulations by staff who are habituated to the class-plays and have been practising then for a long time. Involving frontline staff in protocol production by way of seeking their buy-in or consultation is another aspect of catering for their needs. Ensure proper communication and training as well as ongoing help to prompt the usage of the standardized protocols in the operating theaters.
Change Strategies Lead to Quality Improvement
-
Enhanced Staff Training and Education:
Through the implementation of full training programmes on infection prevention practices, hand hygiene measures, and appropriate PPE usage, healthcare workers can understand what to do and how to do it to prevent secondary infections and create a safer environment for everyone. The latter is a significant factor which ensures safer care, reduced number of errors and thus the improvement of safety level. (Jones et al., 2021). As a productivity indicator here, we presuppose that qualified employees will regularly comply with protocols thus second infection rate decidedly depends on this. Further, being deduced that boosting employees’ aptitude in infection control may likely result in delivering sufficient adequate care to patients who are from the same demographic or diversified clinical backgrounds.
-
Improved Surveillance and Monitoring Systems:
Strengthening surveillance systems provides hospitals with the capability to track the real-time secondary infection ratios, so they can identify outbreaks and trends promptly. Thus, they are prepared for future preventive actions. This anticipatory practice can precisely assist patient safety adopting relevant action and thus providing the quality of care (Smith & Brown, 2020). The condition has risen that screening and intervention based on established data will be accomplished. The infectious diseases that would cause adverse events will be timely addressed during this time with the aims of protecting safety and making sure that all patients get quality care. Also, it is thought that the oversight system is trustworthy, credible, and is available publically, enabling its use evenly at all the concerned levels, leading to informed decision-making.
-
Standardized Infection Prevention Protocols:
Set standardized protocols once, then spread best infection prevention practices (IPC) to all health organizations. This decreases variability in the treatment process which minimizes the risk of malpractice, failure or any omission and helps the emergence of a safe culture, the result of which is the improvement of patient care. (Johnson et al., 2019). It is postulated that the protocols that are standardized are the ones which is evidence-based, feasible, and applicable to the majority of the patient’s population, hence this promotes the equitable care. Additionally, it is also believed that with standard protocol the services will be granted to the patients on equal terms, by taking into account their various factors like income level or other demography stats.
Utilization of change strategies in Interprofessional Considerations
The transfer-of-information strategies closely related to the inhibition of post-infections will however, require coordination between all units in health care to be realized. Here what is noticeable is an encouragement of participatory teamwork among health care providers that comes with the mixing of variety of the health professions such a nurses, physician, people in infection control, and environmental services providers. The multi-dimensional method is achieved through this way, which is the engagement process with the mentioned stakeholders. Sharing of points of view in different other areas happens, also the good techniques are developed, and interventions used (Jones et al., 2021). Working collaboratively, the plan of implementation is systematically checked with the competent authorities ensuring it addresses all the relevant infection prevention and control, which helps and does not diminish patient safety and outcome.
NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2 Change Strategy and Implementation
Seeking support for your NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2? Our team of experts is available to assist you. Don’t hesitate to reach out for assistance.
The Individual difference will it the main factor in such the way of thinking. The health center team will be comprised of frontline and administrative staff, managers and other stakeholders, all of whom will be able to take ownership of the change process and show their support for the proposed plan. Thus, the development of these strategies is based on the use of combined approaches, which gives the plan multi-pronged character, enough remedies for different approaches, and allows you to meet the specific needs and wishes of your healthcare organization (Smith & Brown, 2020). Furthermore, it is important to point out that they will also invoke the sense of belonging and responsibility for those who are involved, and help to create accountability for the initiative by diversifying their interests in successful plan execution.
Explore more related samples Click Below:
NURS FPX 6025 Assessment 3 Practicum and Scholarly Article
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is important to note that the above proposition and strategy are holistic in the fight against worsening conditions of secondary infection which is a common problem healthcare facilities. Intervention based on evidence is assistance for interdisciplinary collaborations, and additional the healthcare institutions should consider safety and equitable care as their top priorities. Through doing this, healthcare institutions can markedly reduce a probability of infections and therefore heightening the health outcomes. The suggested shift in the approaches including the proper training, instruction, and upgradation of surveillance and monitoring systems, the standardization of infection prevention protocols, and the intradepartmental cooperation is trying to create a safety culture, rather than only upgrading or improving existing protocols.
References
Bangkit Putrawan, Dominicus Husada, Parwati Setiono Basuki, Risa Etika, Ismoedijanto, Dwiyanti Puspitasari, & Leny Kartina. (2021). Hand hygiene compliance behavior and glove use in the pediatric intensive care unit during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(4), 861–866.
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127114/
Čater, T., & Pučko, D. (2010). Factors of effective strategy implementation: Empirical evidence from slovenian business practice. Journal of East European Management Studies, 15(3), 207–236.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23281679
Kampf, G., Scheithauer, S., Lemmen, S., Saliou, P., & Suchomel, M. (2020). COVID-19-associated shortage of alcohol-based hand rubs, face masks, medical gloves, and gowns: Proposal for a risk-adapted approach to ensure patient and healthcare worker safety. Journal of Hospital Infection, 105(3), 424–427.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.041
Rowley, D. J., & Sherman, H. (2004). From strategy to change: Implementing the plan in higher education. In Google Books. John Wiley & Sons.
https://books.google.com.pk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=MR4k6m3q- sMC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Change+Strategy+and+Implementation&ots=K8svVVMg5F&sig=B1NnCsIQP-mVhgH61Pl5eFMVwYY& redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Change%20Strategy%20and%20Implementation&f=false
Sonenshein, S. (2009). Emergence of ethical issues during strategic change implementation. Organization Science, 20(1), 223–239.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0364
Sonenshein, S., & Dholakia, U. (2012). Explaining employee engagement with strategic change implementation: A meaning-making approach. Organization Science, 23(1), 1–23.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0651
Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Fernández, M. E., Abadie, B., & Damschroder, L. J. (2019). Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: Diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implementation Science, 14(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4
Require help with your NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2? Our expert team is standing by to assist you. Get in touch with us now