- BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 4
Summary Report: Health Care Information Review
Overview
The health information review, which is proposed to be implemented, would entail collection of data on the demographic of the patient and past history of the patient and intervention measures. As pointed out by Moons et al. (2023), this information is useful in guaranteeing the quality of prescriptions of patients receiving treatment for MI because minor mistakes or side effects resulting from prescriptions may be very costly, sometimes even fatal. Thus, patient safety at Vila Health is boosted by having this information documented in EHR as correctly and specifically as possible. For the purposes of receiving the desired amount of patient data from other institutions, the planned evaluation would use benchmarking together with national databases combined with Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) (Park et al. , 2021). Among the quality efforts included in the request for evaluation are the following: a solution that aims to improve clinical decision making by employing a CDSS, and the recommendations provided by CMS concerning PHI. The objective of this report is to inform the upper management of Vila Health on the selected Information review strategy.
Key Study Components
Thus, the patient’s age, ethnicity and medication record are the three key pieces of information that will have to be obtained during the assessment. Supplemental data will be retrieved from other sources such as national information exchanges like HIEs and Vila Health patient’s electronic medical record containing patient information. Based on the paper by Kaplan et al. (2023), user authentication and role-based access are in fact the two major components of the data security approach. Due to rising concerns in the protection of patient’s health information, this strategy requires limiting the access to the Vila Health’s patient electronic health record to the few practicing healthcare professionals. To facilitate the comparison of the data gathered from the Vila Health dashboard with the metrics obtained from AHRQ and CMS, a specific analysis will be carried out. Before comparison, these collected metrics will be processed using terms used in frameworks such as SNOM(C)T and LIONC (Park et al. , 2021). Since quality is very important in our establishment, we will be implementing the CDSS that would make our new review on PHI very impenetrable to any errors. Similarly in the process of securing the support and engagement of the doctors and the nurses, the already planned change communication shall involve the use of the experiential transformational leadership.
Conclusion
The intended research of the planned study to identify discrepancies in the data collection processes of healthcare facilities across the United States involves a comparison of data from a number of sources. To identify some sort of a misconduct or a mistake at Vila Health in relation to MI illness, the findings of the analysis are going to be compared to the norms of the industry. Different strategies started here will make a difference in the recognition of problematic areas. Thus, patient safety and treatment outcomes will also improve as a result of quality improvement interventions which incorporate CDSSs. The quality of care provided to MI patients will rise as a result of the absence of the possibility of adverse events and violation of professional ethics when disseminating information.
If you need complete information about class 4106, click below to view a related sample:
BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 1 Information Collection
BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Benchmarks and Quality Measures
Gantt Chart
References
Kaplan, B. A., Gilroy, S. P., DeHart, W. B., Brown, J. M., & Koffarnus, M. N. (2023, January 1). Data Handling: Ethical principles, guidelines, and recommended practices (D. J. Cox, N. Y. Syed, M. T. Brodhead, & S. P. Quigley, Eds.). ScienceDirect; Academic Press.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323909693000062
Moons, P., Norekvål, T. M., Arbelo, E., Borregaard, B., Casadei, B., Cosyns, B., Cowie, M. R., Fitzsimons, D., Fraser, A. G., Jaarsma, T., Kirchhof, P., Mauri, J., Mindham, R., Sanders, J., Schiele, F., & Zwisler, A.-D. (2023). Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: Implications for quality of care and management. European Heart Journal, 44(36), 3405–3422.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad514
Park, H.-A., Yu, S.-J., & Jung, H. (2021). Strategies for adopting and implementing SNOMED CT in Korea. Healthcare Informatics Research, 27(1), 3–10.