- BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 1
Information Collection
It is a disease that affects human beings and is characterized by the uncontrolled and unorganized division of cells and the possible formation of a mass or tumor. It presents in a number of ways; the extreme cases might present a health risk and may need an individual management plan to be devised for a condition. Confidentiality of the cancer information is vital to avoid compromise and manageability and enhance the accuracy of the analysis to support the patient’s healing process and research findings (Appelbaum et al., 2021).
The problem area is chosen as cancer as it is also a crucial area in healthcare. Handling of the collected data is required for correct treatment directions and further enhancement of clients’ quality of life. The need for such an assessment is to review and improve how health information is managed from its acquisition and use in care delivery to its disposal and storage while achieving maximum interfaced integration, security, policies, and quality patient outcomes.
Criteria for Differentiating Confidentiality and Security Measures
In fact, the confidentiality and security of patients’ information, mainly cancer information, are of great concern in dealing with patients’ information. Confidentiality and security are two protective factors that are appropriate to the management of information; however, it is crucial to pay attention to the fact that they play different but, in a way, complementary roles. Confidentiality is a duty that deals with the idea that particular data should not be viewable or accessible to everybody.
Instead, it must only be accessible to certain people (Dubovitskaya et al., 2019). This includes measures like access rights, coding, and the identity of the user. Security, on the other hand, addresses the aspects of privacy by ensuring that patient’s information is not revealed to unauthorized persons, thereby eradicating the trust that is violated between patients and agencies that deal with such information.
Electronic Health Records (EHRs) prove to be of immense value in maintaining complete health records, including cancer-related data as well as restricted genetic information (Dubovitskaya et al., 2019). Measures like encryption and controls for data access prevent this information from falling into the wrong hands or getting into the wrong hands to cause identity theft or medical fraud. It is crucial for the protection of a patient’s data, to monitor and diagnose diseases accurately, for customized treatments, for the overall improvement of cancer care research, and to adhere to the principles of marketing and legal compliance.
Security also contains a broader set of preservation efforts that pertain to the protection of information systems from threats of loss or collapse. This entails not only protecting information from unauthorized access, from being read by other parties and restricted from a specific particular use, but also from being written or modified, deleted by other parties, or lost or corrupted in any way. Security procedures allow the constant availability of information during use and the prevention of unauthorized access by implementing a method to restore regular conditions after a security event (Siponen et al., 2021).
The measures that seem to shed light on elementary differences between confidentiality and security include evaluating whether a measure mainly aims at limiting the individuals’ exposure to information or works broadly to defend data from multiple threats (Griffin et al., 2023). Also, confidentiality addresses privacy issues, while security covers a wide range of protective actions that include integrity, availability, and resilience (Krzyzanowski & Manson, 2022).
Compliance with Health Information Laws and Regulations for Managing Cancer Data
Health information confidentiality, therefore, means the legal and moral responsibility to prevent the revelation of patients’ data. Privacy can be defined as the patient’s power to regulate other people’s access to his or her health information. Security means the protection of information from other people getting access to, using, or divulging it (Krzyzanowski & Manson, 2022). Thus, in this context, the Health Insurance Probability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, is the regulation that covers the concern of confidentiality and enhances the protection and reliability of healthcare information systems and data against current and future threats for authentication and accuracy (Jose et al., 2020).
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act enhances HIPAA by increasing the levels of law enforcement as well as extending the provisions of health information confidentiality (Jose et al., 2020). HITECH increases the punitive measures for HIPAA noncompliance, promotes EHRs, and strengthens patients’ entitlement to their information. Through strengthening enforcement and encouraging the enhancement of technology in the management of health information assets, HITECH enhances the achievement of goals for the privacy and security of patient information laid down by HIPAA.
BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 1 Information Collection
It is crucial to note that laws that healthcare organizations must adhere to are Laws of Health Info Privacy, such as the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) regulations (Griffin et al., 2023). This will preserve the patient’s identity, prevent legal consequences, and keep the practice eligible for federal programs like Medicare and Medicaid. HIPAA rules that are associated with the CMS require the safeguarding of the patient’s health information in healthcare organizations (Krzyzanowski & Manson, 2022). Non-compliance leads to fines, loss of accreditation, and program exclusion, affecting an organization’s financial health, ruining its reputation, and endangering patient trust and health.
To address the different regulations concerning the collection of cancer data, the staff members in the health sectors can undergo training in the laws, including the HIPAA, HITECH, and CMS regulations (Griffin et al., 2023). They need to follow the business practices on data acquisition, storage, and transfer, and they must respect patient’s rights to their information. For EHR security, it is crucial to identify the technical and organizational measures, carry out periodic assessments, and confirm the compliance program records (Griffin et al., 2023).
Engagement with the legal and compliance departments ensures that the organization manages to address the complicated legal provisions by making changes to come up with the proper practices for protecting Cancer data. Obtaining data on patients in order to review cancer care quality involves the use of protected health information (PHI), which is training and compliance with HIPAA.
Evaluation Criteria for Information Systems in Data Management
The patient population to be reviewed includes all adults between 40 and 65 years of age diagnosed with cancer. Another demographic category with unique features in cancer relates to treatment and management because aging increases the risk of tumor development and reduces the options for cure ( Specchia et al., 2020). Understanding the difference in the quality of cancer care offered to this particular age group allows for refined practices and improvements that have a positive impact on patients’ satisfaction.
EHR is the best way to identify all the necessary information about patients, including their medical history, treatment regimens, and laboratory findings, which allows for accurate evaluation of the quality of cancer care. Records from the patients’ office visits as well as from hospitalization/admission/ER visits will be used to gain an understanding of cancer care quality in different settings and experiences (Jose et al., 2020). Every patient diagnosed with the selected condition and treated in the specified period will be included in the study with a particular focus on the sample of adult (40-65) patients to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the quality of cancer treatment.
Are you Looking for guidance for BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 1? Our experts are here to assist you. Reach out to us for support today.
The notes to be retrieved consist of history and physical, discharge summaries, lab notes, radiology, and any other notes, and they involve assessment for quality of cancer care. Also, clinical systems or administrative systems may contain demographic and billing data (Griffin et al., 2023). The use of these clinical and administrative systems gives a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of quality cancer care.
Several factors should be taken into consideration when assessing information systems in the context of an organization’s healthcare requirements. First of all, compliance with electronic health record (EHR) systems is crucial. The chosen system should also be compatible with some of the regular EHR solutions to ensure that data sharing and transportation from one health facility to another is simple and effective (Dubovitskaya et al., 2019). Interoperability is also required and highly important as it determines the system’s ability to exchange information and operate with other healthcare systems.
In addition, user-friendliness must be addressed. The system design has to follow best practices so that people in healthcare can approach the system quickly, do their job effectively, and incorporate it into their work routine. Reliability is also important when it comes to patient data safety, and so is the security that the systems have to have. It has to be legal to meet some legal requirements about the security of the system and also to prevent leakage and access to any sensitive information or data by any unauthorized person or a breach. Flexibility for customization is also one of the research requirements of the information system.
It should have the option of configuration for aims at fitting to the particular systems of the healthcare organizations since it has to be agreeable with the outstanding clinical needs and trends (Wang et al., 2020). Lastly, there is the aspect of scalability that can quickly adapt to future expansion and changes in healthcare needs and requirements without considerable investments in other structures or acquisition of costly apparatuses (Wang et al., 2020). Through the assessment of the information systems according to these factors, healthcare organizations can make a suitable choice of solutions that will enhance the fit of their needs for the optimization of their performance in the delivery of patient care and management of data.
Efficient Procedures for Managing the Information Life Cycle
Since this is primary data, it will be gathered directly from patients or actual encounters through documentation in EHRs by healthcare workers while attending to the clients. It will be saved in the patient’s EHR, and only those who have authorization rights to databases and information based on their roles will be granted access to them through encryption. Interoperability standards refer to set protocols that affirm the proper flow of information from one health facility to the other. Connecting an office to the HIE improves the continuity of patient care but also compromises the confidentiality and privacy of the patient’s information (Appelbaum et al., 2021).
Some of the issues obstructing health information standardization are terminology system, format of the data, and system compatibility. Data shall be deleted according to the guidelines of regulation and policy in place concerning disposal, and professional erasure shall be done based on the set and agreed retention periods (Griffin et al., 2023).
The initial tactical practice in the management of the information life cycle includes the standardization of methods that will be adopted in the collection of data. To support decisions, these procedures should incorporate electronic health record (EHR) systems and utilize standard data entry forms (Muhammad et al., 2021). Documentation practices have to ensure compliance with HL7 standards in order to integrate with HIEs for adequate data exchange in healthcare networks.
Engagement in involvement boosts the benefit of the integrated and compatible interface of separated application systems, comprehensiveness for better care management, and patient benefits. Security and scalability should be priorities for storage solutions, whether it is cloud or on-premise server storage, and backup configurations should be used to minimize the risk of data loss (Krzyzanowski & Manson, 2022). Advanced controls such as role-based access controls and encryption define the parameters of access to the information, maintain the confidentiality of the patient’s information, and meet accreditation agencies’ guidelines, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or HIPAA.
Finally, policies regarding the erasure of data should be strong, which ensure the timely and proper disposal of information that is no longer needed or is sensitive as per legal and compliance procedures (Yaqoob et al., 2021). In this way, systematic procedures within the information life cycle guarantee data management and patient data protection at healthcare organizations while pursuing compliance with the regulations. It will ultimately raise the standards and effectiveness of patient care in health facilities.
BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 1 Conclusion
Healthcare processes must adhere to strict protocol because the key to efficient and effective management of information and its life cycle lies in this set of procedures. Through these systematic approaches, healthcare organizations could use products that would interoperate in the system, the privacy of patient information would be protected, and the issue of compliance with the requirements of the HIPAA would have been met. In conclusion, this ensures effective sharing of information, proper coordination, and the improvement of patient care delivery. This is a critical concept in the modern healthcare sector due to the need for information management.
If you need complete information about class 4020, click below to view a related sample:
BHA FPX 4020 Assessment 1 Health Care Problem Analysis Proposal
References
Appelbaum, L., Cambronero, J. P., Stevens, J. P., Horng, S., Pollick, K., Silva, G., Haneuse, S., Piatkowski, G., Benhaga, N., Duey, S., Stevenson, M. A., Mamon, H., Kaplan, I. D., & Rinard, M. C. (2021). Development and validation of a pancreatic cancer risk model for the general population using electronic health records: An observational study. European Journal of Cancer, 143, 19–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.10.019
Dubovitskaya, A., Shukla, R., Zambani, P. S., Schumacher, M., Aberer, K., Xu, Z., Idnani, N., Lachhani, R., Wang, F., Swaminathan, A., Jahangir, M., Baig, F., Chowdhry, K., Ryu, S., & Stoller, S. (2019). ACTION-EHR: Patient-centric blockchain-based EHR data management for cancer care (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8).
Griffin, J. M., Kroner, B. L., Wong, S. L., Preiss, L., Ashley Wilder Smith, Cheville, A. L., Mitchell, S. A., Lancki, N., Hassett, M. J., Schrag, D., Osarogiagbon, R. U., Ridgeway, J. L., Cella, D., Jensen, R. E., Ann Marie Flores, Austin, J. D., Yanez, B., Cella, D., Cheville, A., & Hassett, M. J. (2023). Disparities in electronic health record portal access and use among patients with cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 116(3), 476–484.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djad225
Jose, T., Ohde, J. W., Hays, J. T., Burke, M. V., & Warner, D. O. (2020). Design and pilot implementation of an electronic health record-based system to automatically refer cancer patients to tobacco use treatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 4054.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114054
Krzyzanowski, B., & Manson, S. M. (2022). Twenty years of the HIPAA safe harbor provision: unsolved challenges and ways forward (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research Medical Informatics, 10(8).
Muhammad, G., Alshehri, F., Karray, F., Saddik, A. E., Alsulaiman, M., & Falk, T. H. (2021). A comprehensive survey on multimodal medical signals fusion for smart healthcare systems. Information Fusion, 76(45), 355–375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2021.06.007
Nguyen, P., Le, L. K.-D., Ananthapavan, J., Gao, L., Dunstan, D. W., & Moodie, M. (2022). Economics of sedentary behavior: A systematic review of the cost of illness, cost-effectiveness, and return on investment studies. Preventive Medicine, 15(6), 106-164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106964
Rizwan, M., Shabbir, A., Javed, A. R., Srivastava, G., Gadekallu, T. R., Shabir, M., & Hassan, M. A. (2022). Risk monitoring strategy for the confidentiality of healthcare information. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 100(100), 107-133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107833
Wang, X., Wang, Y., Tao, F., & Liu, A. (2020). The new paradigm of data-driven smart customization through digital twin. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 12(23).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.023
Yaqoob, I., Salah, K., Jayaraman, R., & Al-Hammadi, Y. (2021). Blockchain for healthcare data management: Opportunities, challenges, and future recommendations. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(2), 1–16.