- NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 1
Care Setting Environmental Analysis
The Care Setting Environmental Analysis is thus an essential tool in strategic planning. The paper concentrates on Appreciative Inquiry, also referred to as AI and SWOT analysis, that is, Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It looks at the positive and the negative, as well as what is attainable in giving care, as it analyses the internal strengths and weaknesses and the external opportunities and threats that define the care landscape (Taylor, 2023).
One of the significant difficulties is the need for more qualified personnel, which is ranked as one of the major drivers that harm organizational productivity. The specification, in turn, responds to the objective of covering analytical tools for competitive advantage, which are vital for healthcare strategies. Lastly, it works towards sustaining the competitive advantage by comprehending the environmental pressures, eradicating the sources of strength, and inhibiting the detrimental impacts of threats to achieve favorable results in a care setting.
Stories and Evidence about Best Organizational Performance
At a particular time in our care setting, an inspiring and highly competent episode that highlights the accomplishment of the defined quality and safety ideals happened. They include an extreme focus on quality and safety, as a test case described a patient with numerous health issues and their treatment by an integrated team.
In line with this, the attended enhanced the principles of care delivery through effectively and efficiently coordinated and individualized patient care plans that contributed to the patient’s recovery as they both appreciated quality and compassionate care. One other case that depicted commitment to safety measures occurred during a medication audit. A wise and responsible nurse notices the possible mistakes in dosages and immediately eliminates the resulting adverse outcomes, stressing patient safety and the constant development of practical actions.
The stories support solutions that directly relate to quality and safety. First, the collaborative care plan typically exhibits that we are a caring organization that provides higher-quality services than the statutory requirements and recognizes patients’ uniqueness. Regarding the account of the second branch, commitment to adherence to every safety measure shows a solid approach to error elimination and patient benefit. Letters, medical reports, incident descriptions, and feedback from the patient and healthcare workers back these stories. In the context of positive patient outcome documentation, detailed documentation is up to the cross-disciplinary analysis of the patient’s condition and the efforts that were made by the various professionals in handling the patient.
-
Identifying Positive Themes and Other Evidence
Main and positive themes are apparent here, which are aligned towards patient-centered care, teamwork, and putting preventive measures into safety. This inception of patient-centered care is manifested in the first story by the process of establishing a care plan that best suits the particular patient. The second story describes the positive results of teaming and emphasizes cooperation and constant attention to adverse phenomena in the process of patients’ treatment. Each of these stories highlights the importance of the patient- and teamwork-driven approach to the work that we do within our healthcare environment (Nifakos et al., 2021).
NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 1 Care Setting Environmental Analysis
A statistic already proves the care setting: Since being in the position, patient satisfaction is way over 90%, and clinical outcomes are improving. Already have fewer readmissions and infection rates than the nation’s average. Accumulated organizational accolades such as the Excellence in Patient Care Award and Industries prove the organization is dedicated to rendering exceptional care. Other support is reflected in the appropriate indicators of staff performance, which include KPIs, staff awards, and memberships in organizations, as well as accreditations such as The Joint Commission, which provide evidence of the organization’s compliance with the highest quality standards.
-
Knowledge Gaps
Some of the gaps/uncertainties that have emerged when using the tool in assessing our care setting include the following. Even though our focus is on positive results and above-exampled true stories and data, the overarching need is to explore the details of the circumstances that led to the medication dosage error. Anticipating the root causes of the system’s weaknesses or human failures could help us formulate prevention strategies more effectively (Nifakos et al., 2021). Additionally, expanding the understanding of the patient’s feedback beyond the scoring would be informative and beneficial in improving the patient-centered care model.
Goals for Improvement
Our proposed improvement goals include:
The implementation of routinely held meetings involving all the staff members to practice interdisciplinary communication and teamwork improvement (Hathaway et al., 2022). Patient Engagement Activities: Implementing patient advisory councils to address critical patient net promotor scores to score high, challenging the organizations to attain a more patient-centered approach (Santana et al., 2020). Employing innovative service technology to reduce the chances of incorrect administration of drugs (Manias et al., 2020). Strengthening cultural sensitivity in the staff through cultural competency knowledge as outlined by Brottman et al. (2019). A culture of incident reporting in the workplace for anticipatory actions (Lydon et al., 2021).
Explaining Ethical and Culturally Sensitive Improvements
The recommended interventions guarantee that quality and safety enhancement are done in an ethical and culturally appropriate manner. The interprofessional education and the patient and family advisory council embrace cultural differences and provide culturally appropriate care to the patients to support the organization’s diverse culture (Hathaway et al., 2022). The use of modern technology in the administration of drugs enhances patient protection and care (Manias et al., 2020). The incident reporting system, as well as the cultural competency training documented earlier, reflect the value that We Look Place places on the welfare of all the people in their custody and care (Lydon et al., 2021).
-
Linking to MSTVA and AO
The above goals are relevant to the mission statement of our care setting, aimed at improving the patient’s outcomes and promoting a patient-centric model of care. They reflect the promise of delivering meaningful quality through advanced integrated and positive patient outcomes. Likewise, these goals align with the patient-centered care of our vision, which is identified with the patient advisory council and advanced technology, which provides a patient-centered healthcare model (Manias et al., 2020).
Besides, increased cultural competency demonstrates the espoused values of cardinal transformative healthcare culture – cultural sensitivity (Brottman et al., 2019). They state goals of incrementality, teamwork, patient-centeredness, technology, cross-cultural competence, and events-based solid reporting. They also assume the commitment of the staff to continuing education and maintaining our care setting’s culture of responsibility and development.
SWOT Analysis of Care Setting
Adopting the healthcare organizations’ SWOT analysis worksheet provided by the CMS as the template, we conducted a thorough SWOT analysis of this care setting, stressing quality and safety objectives as recommended by Flanagan (2023).
-
Strengths (S):
Some Care Setting highlights include cross-disciplinary integration and teamwork, as evidenced in the case studies, and orderly coordination in achieving the care setting’s mission, quality, and safety objectives (Flanagan, 2023). Also, our adoption of a proactive culture of precis engagement and timely reporting of incidents enhances our capability of effectively dealing with safety issues.
-
Weaknesses (W):
An identified weakness is the shortage of competent staff/personnel qualified to take up the required positions/tasks. This shortage threatens the accomplishment of quality and safety goals and influences organizational performance. It can be resolved through a continuous staff training program aimed at improving the health workforce’s capability.
-
Opportunities (O):
Areas that have potential for development include the integration of the use of superior technology in handling the administration of the medications with a probable decrease in the possibility of errors and improved safety of the patient. Further, the formation of a patient advisory council offers an opportunity to bring in the patient’s point of view, thereby creating the avenue for the patient UNITING with goals focused on quality and safety through patient-oriented CARE (Flanagan, 2023).
-
Threats (T):
External risks include but are not limited to changes in the policies that govern health care or any other factors that might delay the regular disbursement of services (Junaid et al., 2023). It is against this background that external threats have been highlighted with regard to the organization’s responsivity and strategic planning with a view of maintaining quality and safety.
SWOT analysis was conducted using the SWOT analysis worksheet for healthcare organizations by CMS to accurately analyze the organization’s strengths and weaknesses and reveal opportunities and threats in external conditions (Junaid et al., 2023). This helped in systematically reviewing different aspects of the quality and safety of the care environment.
Key Findings and Connection to Quality and Security Objectives
Strengths in quality and safety include effective teamwork and organizational commitment to improvement. Still, the need for more trained staff can be a threat to these goals.
Area of Concern to be Improved
A serious issue that is suggested in our redesigned SWOT analysis related to our care setting’s mission, vision, and values concerns the lack of adequately trained staff. This shortage has a direct effect on our capacity to deliver quality and safe care and thus is unhelpful in our mission statement to provide quality healthcare services.
This becomes a challenge to the vision of improving a patient-centered approach since a shortage of staff hampers the quality of care, possibly leading to poor-quality treatment plans and minimal attention to individual patients (Brottman et al., 2019). However, this concern is counter to our principles of excellence and compassion as it restricts the possibilities of providing the best care and customers’ satisfaction while possibly compromising their health condition (Brottman et al., 2019). Also, eradicating this staffing issue is crucial for directing our operations toward the accomplishment of the IHS’s mission, vision, and values while embracing professional standards in patient care delivery.
-
Criteria for Evaluating Improvement
To assess improvement, consider these criteria: First of all, determine staff adequacy using the functioning ratio of staff to patients and compare it to the average ratio. Secondly, the changes in the quality and safety of the patients will be progressively analyzed by evaluating the scores of patient satisfaction and clinic outcome results before and after training the staff. Also, staff competence, satisfaction, and stress surveys must be undertaken in order to assess training efficiency (Brottman et al., 2019).
Finally, the changes in the pattern of incident reports after improvement interventions are compared in order to determine the extent of safety improvement. In combination, these criteria assess compliance with attempts to address staff scarcity, coupled with the care setting’s mission, vision, and principles of quality and safety objectives.
Comparison of the AI and SWOT Approaches
Comparing appreciative inquiry (AI) with SWOT analysis, one can identify a significant difference in the role assigned to data collection and data analysis. AI also concentrates on quantitative data, where experiences are narrated, and voice recordings or interviews are collected to obtain the stakeholders’ positive experiences within the care setting. It focuses on the assets and worth, teamwork, and possibly tomorrow. Conversely, SWOT funnels into structured methods such as questionnaires and numerals on the evaluation of the organization’s strengths and weaknesses as performers and receivers of the value and the opportunities and threats in its environment, respectively (Alipour et al., 2022).
It is systematic in its action; it breaks down internal and external factors using numerical considerations. Narrative data also occupies a central place in AI; here, the focus is on the subjectivist view. On the other hand, SWOT is a method that requires significant amounts of quantifiable data and much analytical rating since it deals with hard facts and figures. Communication-wise, AI employs emergent communication and storytelling tactics and is conversational; on the other hand, SWOT is formal in its communication approach and relies on factual analysis and logical presentation of the outcomes (Alipour et al., 2022).
-
Assumptions
In both strategies, the existing assumptions and biases need to be recognized. In AI, it’s essential to keep an eye on the fact that this might lead to overemphasis on positive aspects and successes, and that, in turn, may lead to the loss of sight on such vital issues as the areas for future improvement. Regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, it is crucial to be aware of possible contingencies concerning the evaluation of the numeral data and the prejudice arriving from previous experiences towards internal/external objects (Alipour et al., 2022). The knowledge of these biases assists in avoiding their influence and in giving a round perspective of the care setting.
Desired Leadership Characteristics
The current study also implies that while proposing characteristics of healthcare leadership for improvement projects based on AI or SWOT analysis, they must possess visionary, collaborative, as well as analytical skills. In AI, interpersonal skills, understanding of the personnel’s feelings, and the ability to motivate people to work are crucial.
They help in narration and increase the volume of strengths (Luhalima et al., 2022). On the other hand, projects based on SWOT examination require reasoning, strategic thinking, and rational information analysis. Managers actively focus on structured conversations and participate in formal assessments of the organization’s and environment’s elements.
Uses of Characteristics and Skills for AI and SWOT Projects
Positive attitudes tied with an AI-based project entail creating images of the future and synthesizing achievement orientation and focused communications. These are considered advantageous within a SWOT-based project since they help facilitate structure concerning discussions, data analysis, and the general evaluation process. Standard features of both lean and totem are efficient communication that is integrated with other organizational processes, flexibility, and orientation toward improvement (Zajac et al., 2021).
Communication is vital because it enables leaders to explain any visions and guarantee that their visions are understood. Flipping between the two models, leaders are able to adapt between AI’s story-telling technique and SWOT’s data-focused technique. Openness to feedback and ongoing improvement, regardless of the approach, implies embracing a culture of organizational learning that will not forfeit even with the traditional methods of assessment.
Uncertainties and Gaps
A limitation or an area for further understanding might concern this leader’s flexibility in the relatively qualitative domain, where it is becoming more and more popular to focus only on positive aspects. This challenge is set in opposition to the measure of objectivity necessary in the creation of SWOT that guarantees thorough assessment. Furthermore, uncertainty may relate to the leader’s ability to apply both types precisely (Zajac et al., 2021). This implies achieving the best possible understanding and the maximum of recommendations concerning performance enhancement in healthcare.
NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 1 Conclusion
The Care Setting Environmental Analysis highlights the AI and SWOT methodologies that can be used for the identification of the care setting’s distinctive features, weaknesses, prospects, and threats. It is easy to drown in known and well-documented horror stories; however, just as many, if not more, reports speak of quality and safety improvements.
Desirable goals integrate the organization’s mission and values, and leadership qualities necessary for enhanced performance are identified. To sum up, the identification of uncertainties is critical for achieving the aim of having a comprehensive understanding of the state of the project. The area of concern, staff shortage, stresses the requirement for specific changes. It serves as the foundation for planning strategies for overall continued rivalry in the ever-evolving marketplace for healthcare services.
If you need complete information about class 6021, click below to view a related sample:
NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 2
References
Alipour, F., Jamshidizadeh, S., Bastani, P., & Mehralian, G. (2022). The balanced scorecard as a strategic management tool in hospital pharmacies: An experimental study. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 36(6), 767–780.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-07-2021-0256
Brottman, M. R., Char, D. M., Hattori, R. A., Heeb, R., & Taff, S. D. (2019). Toward cultural competency in health care. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 1.
https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002995
Flanagan, E. (2023). Evaluating outcomes of an integrated medical care model in an acute care hospital: A program evaluation. Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Manuscripts.
Hathaway, J. R., Tarini, B. A., Banerjee, S., Smolkin, C. O., Koos, J. A., & Pati, S. (2022). Healthcare team communication training in the United States: A scoping review. Health Communication, 38(9), 1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2036439
Junaid, M., Zhang, Q., Cao, M., & Adeel Luqman. (2023). Nexus between technology-enabled supply chain dynamic capabilities, integration, resilience, and sustainable performance: An empirical examination of healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122828–122828.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122828
Luhalima, T. R., Mulaudzi, F. M., & Phethlu, R. D. (2022, March 23). Use of an appreciative inquiry approach to enhance quality improvement in the management of patient care. Research Square.
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-30492/v1
Lydon, S., Cupples, M. E., Murphy, A. W., Hart, N., & OʼConnor, P. (2021). A systematic review of measurement tools for the proactive assessment of patient safety in general practice. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(5), e406–e412.
https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000350
Manias, E., Kusljic, S., & Wu, A. (2020). Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: A systematic review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 11(1), 1–29.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098620968309
Morris, M., Mulhall, C., Murphy, P. J., & Eppich, W. J. (2022). Interdisciplinary collaborative working on surgical ward rounds: Reality or rhetoric? A systematic review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 37(4), 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2022.2115023
Nifakos, S., Chandramouli, K., Nikolaou, C. K., Papachristou, P., Koch, S., Panaousis, E., & Bonacina, S. (2021). Influence of human factors on cyber security within healthcare organizations: A systematic review. Sensors, 21(15).
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21155119
Santana, M.-J., Manalili, K., Zelinsky, S., Brien, S., Gibbons, E., King, J., Frank, L., Wallström, S., Fairie, P., Leeb, K., Quan, H., & Sawatzky, R. (2020). Improving the quality of person-centred healthcare from the patient perspective: Development of person-centred quality indicators. British Medical Journal Open, 10(10).
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037323
Taylor, E. (2023). Improving strategic management planning in non-profit organizations: Federally qualified health centers. Doctoral Dissertations and Projects.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/4988/
Zajac, S., Woods, A., Tannenbaum, S., Salas, E., & Holladay, C. L. (2021). Overcoming challenges to teamwork in healthcare: A team effectiveness framework and evidence-based guidance. Frontiers in Communication, 6(1). Frontiersin.